Left Header Right Header
Header 3a   Header Right End A Header Right End B Space
Header Left 3b
Movie Reviews Movie Trivia
FREE Membership MatchFlick Friday - Win Free DVDs

Member Login  [help]
Member Trends
 Top 10 List
 Exclusive Interviews
 Horror Club
 Zombie Club
Movie News
 Current News
 News Archives
Message Board
 Go To The Forum
Cool Statistics
 Member Stats
 Trivia Stats
Columns   [more]
 Have You Been Sp...
 But Can She Act?...
 They're Not The ...
 Time Does Fly Wh...
 Column Archives
Popular Movies  [more]
 World War Z
 Mission Impossible 4
 Twilight Breaking Dawn
Popular People  [more]
 Leonardo DiCaprio
 Megan Fox
 Tom Cruise
 Join for FREE
 About MatchFlick
 Privacy Policy
 Guess That Scene
 RSS Feeds
A History of Icky Part Deux
by Brian Yandle

Subscribe to MatchFlick Movie Columns through RSS
email this column to a friend

Janet Leigh reminds us that classic Horror flicks are a scream.

Janet Leigh reminds us that classic Horror flicks are a scream.
Throughout the history of great Horror films, one has to actually stop & wonder where the true inspiration came from for the so-called "slasher" films. Who created the first slasher film? What thoughts must've ran through their heads when they sat down to write these grisly pieces of entertainment? To whom do we owe the greatest honor & respect?

Personally, I don't believe there is a single Director out there either living or dead who didn't owe a huge debt to Mr. Hitchcock at some point in their career. No matter how clever or ingenius these directors have been, being placed in the same sentence as Hitchcock is a grand achievement & no one has even come to close to filling these huge shoes though some have done remarkable things in film-making history.

Dario Argento, Brian DePalma, & David Lynch are just a few of the popular names that come to mind when I think of the irreplaceable Hitchcock. Obviously, these directors are different as night & day but all have been compared at some point or another to the master himself with good reason. The actual list of directors is far greater than one could ever hope to compile or even imagine but those examples should be a good reference & perhaps a great starting point for film addicts like myself who love to explore great cinema.

Admittedly,Hitchcock never made a bad film to the best of my knowledge. However, I have to say upfront that the character Norman Bates in Psycho stuck with me longer than any other character he brought to life on the silver scream. As time has clearly proven, Psycho may very well have been one of his most influential films when we begin to examine the many spin-offs & spawned sequels. I sometimes have to wonder if Hitchcock himself knew the impact that Psycho might have on the audiences 10, 20, 30, or 40 years down the road. This seemingly endless legacy is almost
I warned you about watching those icky-sicky Horror flicks.

I warned you about watching those icky-sicky Horror flicks.
as interesting as the original film itself & that's very difficult to believe.

Although Hitchcock never made slasher films per se, one could argue that he is the godfather of slasher films. One of the most evident homages to Psycho is William Lustig's Maniac which holds up quite well even to this day thanks to Blue Underground. Maniac is, by far, gorier & sicker than anything Hitchcock would've imagined but clearly reminds us of Psycho as both homicidal maniacs have the mother fixation & tend to speak with their dead mothers frequently. There is also a sly reference or perhaps variation to the infamous shower scene as well only Lustig employs a bath tub this time around. Maniac is far more bleak & disturbing than Hitchcock's Psycho but it's a worthwhile film nonetheless largely due to Joe Spinell's pitch-perfect performance.

Another entertaining film of the early eighties was the Canadian film Funeral Home. Director William Fruet was immediately accused of plagiarism when this film was initially released in theatres. Although I can clearly see the resemblences to Psycho, I still think Fruet's work was original enough to stand on it's own. Funeral Home is a suspenseful yarn about a young woman who agrees to help her sweet grandmother turn an old funeral parlor into a bed-and-breakfast establishment. Not long after the granddaughter settles in, she begins to hear voices in the basement & begins to suspect that something very sinister may be taking place in her newfound home. Although not nearly as disturbing or icky as Maniac, both films clearly take their nods at Hitchcock.

The eighties also saw the triumphant return of Norman Bates 25 years after the events that took place in the original. Hitchock, ofcourse, would not be involved in the production but the saving grace for Psycho 2 as well as 3 is the presence of Anthony Perkins
He's back afer 25 years & he doesn't need an introduction here....

He's back afer 25 years & he doesn't need an introduction here....
reprising his role of Norman Bates. I don't know about anyone else & perhaps am only speaking for myself but I simply can't imagine another actor pulling off this role. Psycho 2 & 3 are surprisingly quite good as far as sequels go & I truly believe the same house/motel set did help to evoke the suspense or terror of the original. Note of Trivia: Perkins also ended up in the Director's chair for the third entry in this series.

Although both films are worthy sequels which aren't a waste of the viewer's time, it's obvious these films would probably have appealed more to the younger generation as they are far bloodier & even a bit more sexual than the Hitchcock classic. I simply couldn't imagine the older generation being able to tolerate the blood & gore which slasher film fans absolutely lavish. Fortunately, these sequels do maintain the high level of suspense which the original exudes & even manage to uphold the oddball dark humor that Hitchcock himself would appreciate.

The Psycho films didn't completely cease, however, with the third entry. Psycho 4: The Beginning would re-vist the tried & true themes as Norman Bates recounts his horrid childhood memories for a late-night radio show host. Henry Thomas would play the young Norman Bates. Although I've yet to watch this final entry, I have read some positive comments on the film which originally aired on Showtime back in the early nineties.

Though all the films may pale in comparsion to the first one, I believe this may be one of the more consistent & entertaining horror series of all time.

Psycho's influence still remains after all these years in the late nineties & Gus Van Sant bequeathed his frame-for-frame re-creation of the classic. Although this was a great compliment to Alfred Hitchcock, Van Sant's re-creation lacked much originality & the film failed on many different
Anthony Perkins proved he was worthy of Director's seat with Psycho 3.

Anthony Perkins proved he was worthy of Director's seat with Psycho 3.
levels. Sadly, Vince Vaughn was miscast as Norman Bates which was a huge mistake in my opinion. Vince has proven that he can act time & again but it's virtually an impossible task for him to match the intensity of Perkins in this needless re-make. Although Van Sant's Psycho wouldn't be the first or last blunder as far as unnecessary re-makes go, the world could've just as easily done without.

Countless other films still borrow elements from Psycho even now in the new millenium such as Identity & the more recent Vacancy. As anyone can predict, these films will be blessed with average to very good performances yet none of them will bring anything new or significant to the table. Sometimes it's best to leave good enough alone & to stop monkeying with tradition.

A short history of ickiness can take us all around the world & back again when we re-visit the classics as well as the second-rate box office wonders which surface today. We all have seen the good, the bad, & the ugly when it comes to rehashed elements of great horror cinema. Although visiting every Horror film ever made which may be the end product of some terrific influences is certainly futile, it's always good to know the source of inspiration for the films we see today & to perhaps take note of the grand works which may have been overlooked or simply forgotten.

This Halloween, I'll prepare my usual caramel popcorn balls & set aside a bowl of candy for the kiddies who may trail through my neighborhood. I'm currently sorting through old titles to perhaps re-visit or titles which I've never seen to this day. 'Tis the season to be scared senseless & to be sick to your stomach. Enjoy your holiday & watch out for razors in your apples. Unpleasant dreams, my friends.

Keep it evil. Keep it real.

email this column to a friend

Comment on this Column:

Sorry, you must be a member to add comments to columns.

Join or Login.

Subscribe to MatchFlick Movie Reviews through RSS

Sinema Infatuated Junkie
Every other Saturday

Dissecting artwork be it trash cinema or tomorrow's cult classic wannabes & spreading the knowledge on how to distinguish the real from the reels. Exploring unchartered territories throughout history of film-making which have been overlooked & simply deserve a second chance.

Other Columns
Other columns by Brian Yandle:

Interview With Lucifer Valentine

Interview with Filmmaker Toby Ross

Zombies Will Eat Us

100 Movies to See Before You Die Pt. 2

100 Movies to See Before You Die Pt. 1

All Columns

Brian Yandle
If Pan met Apollo down with the sin, I would be amongst the angels who descended to Earth with great mission to seek newfound meaning & to explore great sinema. Brian was born in 1974 ofcourse on the NC/VA border & has been watching movies for as far back as he can remember. One should never forget a great movie nor pass up the chance to spread the word on a bad one.

If you have a comment, question, or suggestion, you can send a message to Brian Yandle by clicking here.

Digg This Column

  Terms of Use | Press | Contact Us
Partnership and Advertising Opportunities | Movie Database | Merchandise

©2004-2017 MatchFlick®. All rights reserved.

Web Analytics