Left Header Right Header
Header 3a   Header Right End A Header Right End B Space
Header Left 3b
Movie Reviews Columns Movie Trivia Now Playing News
FREE Membership Member Login About MatchFlick  FAQ's MatchFlick Friday

Steal of the Day
Left Behind Trilogy 4-Disc Set DVD
$24.98
$11.99
The Steal of the Day is offered by MatchFlick's DVD partner, FamilyVideo.com.


 

Member Login  [help]
 
 
 
 
 
Membership
 Join for FREE
 FAQs
 About MatchFlick
 Privacy Policy
Popular Movies  [more]
 Fight Club
 Pulp Fiction
 Eternal Sunshine
Popular People  [more]
 Johnny Depp
 Tom Hanks
 Natalie Portman
Member Trends
 Horror Club
 Exclusive Interviews
Cool Statistics
 Reviewer Stats
 Trivia Stats
Movie News
 Current News
 News Archives
Message Board
 Go To The Forum
Columns   [more]
 Good Hair Is A G...
 This Is It: It's...
 Mutants On Parad...
 That Touch Of Ca...
 COLUMNS ARCHIVES
Contests
 GUESS THAT SCENE
Syndication
 RSS FEEDS
Ben-His and Ben-Hers, Two Versions of a Classic
by Jonathan Alexandratos

Subscribe to MatchFlick Movie Columns through RSS
email this column to a friend

So I'm sitting in my Religion course typing this column. Well, by now I've been booted from the class and am writing my next column with all the spare time I have now. But Religion is a pretty cool subject to take in college. You spend an hour learning how much better death is than life. Not only that, you learn about all the blessings in life. This column is certainly one of them. I get so many great complements now that I write for this site. I receive great comments like, "What are you selling again?" "Who are you and why are you talking to me?" and "Yo, tell that Lance Norris he's hilarious!" Anyway, like I said, I'm in Religion now and what better film to talk about than the ever-accurate BEN-HUR (1925/1959)? What most people don't know is that this film is, indeed, a remake. BEN-HUR: A TALE OF THE CHRIST was a silent picture that was released in 1925. The Charlton Heston version that we all know came out in '59. Both versions, by the way, are available on the 4-disc BEN-HUR DVD in stores as of last Tuesday (this is the part where Warner Bros. gives me loads of money for plugging their set...still waiting Warner...)

We'll start with a look at 1925's BEN-HUR. It was directed by Fred Niblo who was the vision behind many of lesser-known silent films including one called SEX (1920). Cool. Ben-Hur, or "Benny," as his friends used to call him, was played by Ramon Novarro. Novarro, not an actor of Heston's fame, can be seen in MATA HARI alongside the great Greta Garbo. The big name in the original BEN-HUR was Francis X. Bushman, who played Messala. Bushman, just "fyi," was Mr. Tyson in SABRINA (the original, and then in the remake when Harrison Ford re-animates his corpse). The film, though not an Academy Award mega-winner like its remake, did establish MGM as a big-name studio. The extravagance of its sets (including a chariot race that wasn't at all bad), lavishness of the costumes, and pretty good cinematography all proved that the early Metro Goldwyn Mayer studios had what it took to rank with the filmmaking elites. The acting was, in some cases, a bit over-the-top, but such was necessary in silent pictures as the actors relied on facial expressions over words.

Fast forward to 1959, BEN-HUR the second impresses audiences across the world. This film was directed by William Wyler, a director well-recognized in the film community for not only this picture, but ROMAN HOLIDAY, MRS. MINIVER, HOW TO STEAL A MILLION and many more. Charlton Heston, needing no introduction, starred as big Ben-Hur in this one. The film won 11 Oscars, a record for the time. Even today, the movie's chariot race is remembered as one of filmdom's finest sequences. Interesting to note, Italian director Sergio Leone (discussed in last week's column) played a minor role in the filming of this scene.

All in all, see both films. No need to do it in chronological order (the story is roughly the same), but do watch both. If you really get into it, you can read the book, which was also popular at the time of its release. But no one wants to do that. That's why we have movies (spoken like a true college student). There was also a play made of the novel that did gain some acclaim. Reassembling the actors would be, to say the least, tough, though. Alright, that's it for me. Now I need to get back to Religion. Not the class, I mean actual Religion. To pray for either academic success or to win it big on a really trendy game show. (By the way, sorry for all the parenthetical remarks, I know they're there, I just don't want to do anything about them)

email this column to a friend

Comment on this Column:

Sorry, you must be a member to add comments to columns.

Join or Login.


Subscribe to MatchFlick Movie Reviews through RSS



I'll Be Back... Again
Every other Wednesday

For anyone who's ever been told "You should have seen the original," this column provides insight into any film that’s been remade, rehashed, or re-envisioned.


Other Columns
Other columns by Jonathan Alexandratos:

Hey, I'm Telling People What To Do!

Turkey and APES

Adultery!

Titanic Remakes

History's News II

All Columns


Jonathan Alexandratos
Jonathan is a college student in New York. He is already an accomplished writer, having completed 3 full-length plays and numerous poems. He is also working on his first book.


Contact
If you have a comment, question, or suggestion, you can send a message to Jonathan Alexandratos by clicking here.


Digg This Column


  RSS | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | About MatchFlick® | Press | Contact Us | FAQs
Partnership and Advertising Opportunities | Movie Database | Merchandise

©2004-2009 MatchFlick®. All rights reserved.
©MOVIE IMAGES ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED AND THE PROPERTY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS